Love, Theoretically by Ali Hazelwood: A Delightful STEM-Infused Tangle of Romance and Chaos
If there’s one author who has captured the hearts of STEM enthusiasts and romance lovers alike, it’s Ali Hazelwood. Her latest offering, Love, Theoretically, drew me in the moment I read about “lesbians and STEM”—two words sure to grab my attention and spark my imagination. I mean, who wouldn’t want to dive into a world where the complexities of physics intermingle with the intricacies of love?
Now let’s set the stage: Love, Theoretically unfolds in the high-stakes world of academia, featuring Elsie, an adjunct professor navigating the tumultuous waters between love, rivalry, and, let’s be honest, the absurdities of life as a woman in STEM. She finds herself facing off against Jack, a brooding experimental physicist whose reputation is as intimidating as his presence. Right off the bat, I was invested in their feisty, witty exchanges that hover between enemy and love interest.
Speaking of Jack, let’s address the elephant in the room—he’s described as “big.” And, oh boy, was it mentioned a tad too often for my taste. Let’s tone it down just a notch, shall we? I mean, I love a physically imposing love interest as much as anyone, but twelve mentions of “big” is, to borrow a phrase, a bit much. But I digress!
Hazelwood’s trademark humor and sharp dialogue are on full display in this book. The physics jokes flowed like soda at a science fair, and I found myself chuckling along as Elsie navigated her chaotic life—juggling her fake dating gig while trying to outsmart Jack in the academic arena. Her character development from a people-pleaser to someone who finally asserts her own desires is both refreshing and relatable.
Now, let’s talk about the delightful side characters. Can we make room for George and Dora to get their own romantic adventure? George, a kick-ass physicist, is my forever idol, and her wife, who cooks souvlaki, just seals the deal. How could you not root for them? They offered a vibrant canvas in the otherwise academic world, and their dynamic is something I want more of. Seriously, Ali, consider writing a couple’s spin-off—this duo deserves their spotlight!
Though I enjoyed many aspects, I couldn’t help but notice some recurring themes that feel familiar if you’ve read Hazelwood’s previous works. While I appreciate the exploration of aroace representation, the reliance on certain tropes—like miscommunication or misunderstanding love interests—felt a little overdone. It’s like I was watching a well-loved romcom, but I craved something a bit more unexpected.
And yes, I will forever stand by my disdain for the word “Daddy”—it feels jarring in a scientific romance context. To me, it belongs in another genre entirely, so let’s leave it out of our STEM conversations, okay?
With all that said, Love, Theoretically was an entertaining read filled with humor, relatable struggles, and a sprinkle of academic rivalry that kept the pages turning. If you’re someone who craves witty banter, a touch of heart, and the charm of a STEM universe where women shine, then this book might just be your next favorite.
In conclusion, while it may not be a ground-breaking departure from Hazelwood’s previous narratives, it still offers a delightful escape into the world of science, love, and friendship. I left the story feeling warm and fuzzy, yearning for more adventures, especially those featuring George and Dora. So grab your lab coat and your sense of humor—Love, Theoretically is a wild ride you won’t want to miss!