Review of Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, …
When I first picked up Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, … by the outspoken authors, I was intrigued. Political narratives often shape how we perceive our leaders, and I was curious to see how their critiques would unfold. As a Democrat and an ardent supporter of President Biden, I approached this book with both hope and trepidation. By the time I finished, I felt like I had to navigate not just the words on the page, but also the myriad emotions they stirred within me.
The book opens with a Shakespearean quote, which felt like a warning bell ringing. Right from the outset, there is a sense of defensiveness that hinted at vulnerabilities rather than presenting a robust critique. The authors assert, “Our only agenda…”—a phrase that made my internal skeptic raise its eyebrows. When authors claim a singular agenda to explain their stance, it often suggests that underlying motives could be lingering beneath the surface.
One of the core themes of the book is Biden’s purported decline, showcased through selected interviews with approximately 200 unnamed sources. This anonymity breeds skepticism in a work that thrives on authenticity. It leaves readers questioning the validity of their claims. I kept asking myself, “Can I trust this narrative?” I felt akin to a detective sifting through clues—only to find that many were obscured.
To my dismay, the book often veers into a repetitive cycle of critiquing Biden without offering new insights or contemplative discourse. I found the portrayal of Biden as “the father of this election calamity” to be misguided. Yes, Biden has his flaws—a fact that can’t be disputed—but the book’s constant picking at him felt more like a vendetta than a balanced exploration. Aging is unavoidable, yet the authors handled the topic with an insensitivity that seemed out of place.
One point which struck me was their obsession with Biden’s past, particularly the tragic events surrounding his family. While I appreciate that these elements shape a person, rehashing them in such a gossipy manner felt tasteless. There is a human story at play that deserves nuance, one that the authors overlooked in their eagerness to demonize. For example, Biden’s struggles with memory are presented as weaknesses, yet anyone grappling with loss knows how unpredictable trauma can be.
I found parts of the book unbearable, almost like staring at peeling paint. The narrative lacked a gripping momentum, feeling bogged down with unnecessary details that did little to enhance the overall discussion. As I read, I longed for a more vibrant exploration of the political landscape rather than the dry commentary that unfolded.
Despite its heavy criticisms, I still admire the authors’ ambition. Perhaps a different framing could have yielded a thought-provoking exploration of our current political era. As someone who believes in empathy, I wish they had harnessed that in their critique.
Original Sin may resonate with those wary of President Biden’s presidency, yet it’s not for everyone. Readers hoping for a nuanced, deeply researched discussion will likely be disappointed. For me, it was an exercise in frustration, but also an invitation to advocate for a more compassionate discourse in political writings.
Ultimately, I thank President Biden for bringing warmth and humanity back to the White House, qualities that reflect a soul often missing in political discussions today. This book, however, will sit on my shelf as a reminder that not all stories are best told through shadows.
Discover more about Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, … on GoodReads >>